Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Belt Buckles Grind Dancing

Q 1 / 2: Why is it so difficult to remain objective in the ethical judgments?

impromptu speeches by F. Hartmann, V. Lubbe to the question:

Why is it so difficult to remain objective in the ethical judgments.





textual basis for the speeches: Hectir Zagal, ethics for young people, published by Reclam-Verlag. A discussion on the issue of objectivity in opinion joined in the impromptu speeches, the perspective was given mainly to Nicolai Hartmann and A. Ayer.


----------------------------
rate: 11 pl1 hem
Date: 09:02:11
topic: metaethical problems morality

Where Sleeper Self Piercing Earrings

Q 3 / 4: An exchange of letters between Einstein and Freud: Why War?

Albert Einstein wrote in 1932 a letter to the psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud. In this letter, Einstein presented his thoughts on the question of the causes of violence, aggression and war are. Einstein asked Freud for an opinion. Based on general causes of war has been particularly found that Einstein looks at the individual level, the causes of war, but this plane is completed in the cause of war typology (Kenneth Waltz) by the social and international level.



to see the reasoning of Einstein's own records, to the arguments of Freud as a guide following slide:


---------------------------------------- ---------
courses: Q3 / 4 pl1 and pl2
date 27.01.11 and 03:02:11
Topic: Why war? An exchange of letters between Albert Einstein and Sigmund Freud

Kart Go Kart On Street Intrepid

Q 1 / 2: language of ethics - the ethics of language

be established, under the philosophy of language must consider that also plays in the ethical and moral dilemmas analysis of language as communication, expression and information resources a major role.

To avoid difficulties in understanding and facilitating processes of understanding, it is therefore necessary to have a "common language game" to play and the content and the use of terms to determine.

At the meeting of 3:02:11 so there was a disambig instead of on the following:
  • standards
  • moral values
  • philosophical ethics, metaethics, descriptive and normative ethics
  • applied ethics: bioethics, medicine and engineering ethics, political ethics, etc.

comprehension problems are possible as well as Argumentaions and final error in the statement of appeal. Naturalistic Fallacies (See also Hume, Moore) are therefore to be avoided (see also moral syllogism).
addition, for meta-ethical framework even when the judgments between pragmatic and moral Judgments are Differential sheet. A decision or an action may well be pragmatically right, but morally wrong.

----------------------------------------------- ---------------
rate: 11 pl1 gN HEM
Date: 03:02:11
Topic: Ethical concepts

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Dish Network 322 Diagram To Tv

Q 1 / 2: shooting or dying? At high school

Imagine someone gives you a gun and says :


. "shooting it to your father or your mother then you are free, suicide is not an option, because if you kill yourself, then we will kill them both.."

How you choose?


See also the entries to the poll ...

NOTES:
  • escape is impossible.
  • The one who surrendered the gun is no longer in the room.
  • are enough ammunition is available.

considerations from the meeting of 2:02:11