Ina has raised some questions that a philosophical attitude, or rather, those who want to take them or think they have already taken, should be of interest. To face these questions every now and then, raises awareness of themselves and their own position in the immediate or wider (social) context. Because with all due respect, it's about philosophy, and therefore also in PQ.
What makes me, as the context of my "parts" are, of what I am and do? As I stand in relation to the world around me? What is the world, how are their "parts" together? Finally, how does my action or the action of another of these relationships, how verschöbe its composition? These are central questions of philosophy. She is the mother of the conscious distinction, and thus also the relationship of the difference.
But why now the question of accountability for my decisions and actions other ? Why the question about the transparency of my motives, the basis for accountability?
For me these questions with awareness, building upon the sense of responsibility and out again to do constructive trust.
If I myself do not have my motives in mind, am I can not account on the way to a decision and my priorities and values, then there is a good deal of my personality, "under the surface." It is even I can not 'predictable and reliable. Then I can always surprise only back itself - whether it is always positive surprises but I doubt it. Surprise is just a short distance from unpredictability. And that is bad for everyone (social) context. No one likes to live in an unpredictable nature, we are constantly trying to tame nature and foreseeability of her drive out the unwelcome surprises. Nor may it be with unpredictable people together. (The fact that in the end despite all the effort but then not everything is predictable or can be made and how it helps living in the PQ should be subject of another article.)
why It is important not only that I myself can understand my choices, but also give another insight, that make me transparent and this transparency before even aspiring to me. The first is to track down the reasons - what does that mean at this point, they change in their weight. It is just about her collection. More does not want transparency. I know what moves me the forces that act in me?
In the second step is then a matter of determining the relationships between these forces. Strung together they form an inner causal chain, so to speak. Only when that is threaded, then I can say that I am aware of a decision. Only I can stand her and take responsibility.
trust in others can now take me all the more, the clearer I decide for you / handle. Get to know me is not just to see the results of my decisions / actions simply, but also the way there. Where can I give such an insight into me, as occurs nearby. And where near arises because trust can flourish.
Who understands why something is happening, what is the causal chain behind it, where it is easier, of what is to close on the future. Openness, transparency, accountability now reduces complexity tomorrow. Because trust is a means of Reduction of complexity. Where can I trust, I must observe that is just not always all the details and check. Familiar as I can "black box" look, that hide its complex inner workings.
So PQ leads indirectly to the promotion of trust to a reduction of complexity, although it first may appear different. If I made a philosophical stance, me and my motives of the links will deliberately to take responsibility. When are for me and other decision-making and chains of action on that basis to understand. Then I can rely on me, then others can rely on me. And then ... then the banners, the Verifiable it were packaged in a box and at first are discarded. Then no further testing or continuous vigilance is necessary. This saves power.
PQ does not mean intellectual hypertrophy in the form of deliberate non-stop questioning. PQ is rather to be able to give account to make transparent, establish accountability for each retrievable ability to realize when needed. But this ability does not need to constantly applied to everything. On the contrary, your aim is to remain possible in the background. Even thought or consciousness is not a goal in itself but a step on the path to a destination. Is this achieved - such as trust in me and others - may I direct my steps again somewhere else.
