Steam Heat Radiator Adjust Temperature

Stand back, please!

think I said nice of you, Ina: "PQ is a form of intelligence, which is not limited to, rational arguments to be weighed against each other [...]." Exactly why that is worth the extension the Q-list! IQ is the intelligence where is the "pure" rationality see. Not for nothing seems the IQ of a child of the time behaviourism and rationalization delusion.

the IQ intelligence is calculating, with her it's about power. But life just can not be solved by calculation. And joy is certainly not an issue of the calculation. So it is not surprising that at some point this cold calculating the mania was opposed EQ intelligence. This again was in the heat of dealing with life. The man moved back into the picture. It was no longer just about performance, so as to give people (ultimately interchangeable) factor of production, but the inner (Emotions, self-awareness) and the intermediate (social competence, empathy).

IQ as EQ - important as they are - but both seem to me now (almost necessary) restrict or, uh, self-indulgent. And that would compensate for PQ. PQ looks beyond the specific problem to be solved also with IQ. PQ puts the people and the human factor in a context. PQ is the intelligence that directs the "look beyond just the addition" to what IQ and EQ turn. PQ lifts the look of a concrete situation as a sewing in her lap and looks into the distance, the universal, to the context, the implications, ultimately, on the uncertain and (perhaps) as incomprehensible from a window.

PQ comes back again and again and freed the people from the shackles of constraints and urgency. As nice as it sounds, if today everywhere is advised, but to be more "in the here and now", I do believe that such advice is too sweeping. The specifically human does not express itself in the IQ. The specifically human is not to be found in the EQ. Specifically human, however, is the ability to not simply of the need for rational problem-solving or a feeling to have (to) drive, but ... pause to withdraw to think.

What then is it when you look up to withdraw, from the concrete and the view expands, the (!) is the subject of PQ. In order to be able to work around, is the goal of philosophical attitude. For what then suddenly comes into view is not always pleasant. It rattles the robustness gained so far, and leads to limit the openness.

-Ralf

Vids Of How To Masterrbate

thinking is a stroke of luck ...

The thinking is to some extent the use of PQ - PQ is a form of intelligence, which is not limited to, rational argument to weigh and to be confined to the acknowledge what has been approved as the criteria (similar the game of the mind with itself, as Hannah Arendt has described very nice), but because of the philosophical views of just beyond and the "friendship" with what may be incomprehensible, what opens up behind it.

The encounter with the incomprehensible can now have two possibilities - first, and that is what Ralf has described the joy and the pursuit of balance, as the encounter with something new that enriches us, which shows us what It is everything else and thus open a window rather than a perspective (namely, our previous) destroyed.

The other is the much more familiar with, namely the interpretation that the other side of the border now threatens the self, perhaps belies or at least to call, the imperfection of their own Add perspective. This description is found in the actually very nice band: Why thinking makes you sad by George Steiner again, and so it is also clear how much it damages our human spirit to its own limitations, so much of this frustration bypass when the " objective "of the intellectual effort changes. If there is no longer a question of finding a final statement of reasons to write the perfect song or doing exactly the right thing, then we can reach this truth miss not permanent: it's just really only what is, and if we then are able to take this a sophisticated entertainment - and nothing else means PQ - to find out to what I money for this "is" get up, then the thinking is anything as sad, it is the source of real happiness.

Ina

How To A Unlock Trackfone

maintain a balance with PQ - I have no regrets

PQ should help lead to a "good life", ie a life of joy, which can not tarnish easily without having to entrench themselves.

It is therefore important to maintain a balance between ...

• robustness, stability, conservation, the present, in kind, efficiency, safety
• openness, flexibility, plasticity, future, new, other things, hope

It is our opinion, the condition for the possibility of a "good . Life "joy without a stability and security only a fleeting ray of hope in an otherwise anxiety-making world. Pleasure without openness and flexibility, however ossified and leads to backwardness

joy can therefore thrive only there long term, where a balance exists between internal and facing the outside "forces" to get between preservation and change.

How does this balance and can be produced? Makes it can not just walk into every person? No, unfortunately not. In most cases, robustness and openness in the significant imbalance. While Balance not static but an ongoing process, so that even during the balancing almost always there is an imbalance, so must prevail. But the imbalances of the successful balancing are minimal, are constantly changing and moving ideally very closely around the infinitesimally small rest point of balance.

Not only are most of robustness and openness in an unequal relation to each other, enabling real joy to experience again and again uncontrollably volatile. You can, we think, hardly be sustainable are in balance, because of an awareness about missing out that that balance is necessary.

balancing is a deliberate act. Only balanced, who has chosen to do so. And it only decides on who the recognized value of the balance.

awareness, knowledge, decision to include a "good life". And that's the point in PQ. A philosophical attitude seeks to consciousness strives for knowledge and facilitates the decision.

line through the film adaptation of the life of Edith Piaf is again their song title and motto "Non, je ne regrette rien" in conversation. Nothing to regret doing everything back the way you've already done if you were given the opportunity again exerts fascination, indeed seems positively desirable. And ... This idea corresponds entirely to what it's PQ. For without repentance can only be one who lives and consciously decides.

Awareness is the prerequisite for their own decisions. Without awareness, you decide yourself, but it is ruled by unconscious mental institutions. Only with awareness, you become real actors and "perpetrators", without reacting to it and "victim". For those who only responded and "victim of circumstances" is, has no choice and no responsibility. Yet both are required for repentance. It is as it were the reverse of the medal and the possible consequence. Only those who consciously decide, you can choose wrong and therefore regret the decision, too.

that Edith Piaf as a "victim of circumstances" has seen is hard to believe. Insurance, they have no regrets arose, therefore, a very conscious of living. Or else: a very conscious way of life leads almost necessarily to a life on the one exclaims, "I regret nothing!" For who is always conscious decision to opt for never something that already is certain at the moment of decision, either to regret later. Conscious decisions can not be different. Repentance is the possibility of other decision-ahead, however.

The goal of PQ could be possible to live a life according to the motto of Edith Piaf: I regret nothing!

-Ralf

Teething And Rash On Legs

A "good life" as the target of PQ PQ

PQ seems to us to the usual * Q as IQ, EQ etc. at least a useful addition. Situations where a PQ, a philosophical attitude can be helpful seem to afford the time. But what is the benefit of a PQ?

Another Q in the ranks of existing is not a benefit, but can at best be an occasion to reflect on the usefulness. The claim that there are many situations in which PQ is useful to show the benefits not yet measured directly, but said it only. Not for anything else however, it was before. We just wanted to first provide a little context for PQ. This blog's a diary of our own approach to PQ. In this respect, we do not go straight towards a clear goal, but rather tortuous path in a fog inside. And as we come now to the question: What PQ is to bring in practice? Where to help PQ?

Our answer, in brief: PQ is to help a "good life" to have.

Sounds simple, sounds like a commonplace. A "good life" but all sorts of "practices" to the target. Also, IQ and EQ and SQ do, more or less explicitly help to lead a good life, right?

Sure, so far the PQ ranks first in only one long series of offers. Unlike many other offers we can hold on for ever but PQ: PQ is not alone bring salvation. With PQ alone, a "good life" can not be achieved. This includes everything. For us, PQ Thus a complementary offer to others - which we think, however, that it is just not achievable without PQ as well, the "good life".

And what may But our view a "good life" look like? We think it through at least the following aspects:

• joy
• robustness
• openness

In a "good" life, the positive, the joyful moments prevail. Laughter, recognition, security, sense of fullness, freedom, development and safety are our aspects of joy. A more precise definition of joy to us does not seem important, as long as we pathological forms of enjoyment (eg enjoyment of Injury leave of others) on the outside, seems a consensus more about what is part of the joy of culturally evident. Everyone will feel competent to distinguish a joyful situation from a non-joyous.

joy is certainly the center of a "good life". But joy is just very volatile. A "good life" For us, therefore, a certain robustness. Without joy, it can be dull quickly. Self-confidence and serenity are aspects of such robustness or stability, protect the joyful personality against the adversities of life.

joy therefore needs help to preserve it. Keep positive but may turn into negative bricking. Robustness needs therefore a drag. We believe that openness should be the opposing force. Openness makes the ramparts against the adversities of life permeable. A "good life" requires goodwill to make the smile does not freeze. Who in the world does not challenge openly and sympathetically, the entrenched behind its robustness.

Conversely, someone, openness and good will is not robust opposes such a leaf in the wind. Who will openness on stability, misses out on the development of a contoured personality. Conversely, head to the concrete personality, who represents stability of openness.

A "good life" has as its core, the joy, therefore, requires a balance between robustness and openness.


We now think that PQ can help, no, absolutely necessary to such an extent defined "good life" to live forever in our time and our culture.

-Ralf

Stop Leaking Water Bottles For Chinchillas

PQ, that is, a philosophical attitude is, for us, of course, not simply a matter of continuing a series acronym. Motto: "complete the following list: EQ, IQ, MQ, __." PQ is not intended as intellectual game for bridging commercial breaks.

PQ for us is rather a matter of everyday life. When Karl Popper says "All men are philosophers" , we believe that is exactly the expression PQ.

For PQ so no study is necessary, PQ requires no religious faith, you have to know not even know who Karl Popper and Kant or Plato were. Even if the PQ term "philosophy" lies, is a special philosophical knowledge - in particular the history of philosophy - not necessary.

The need for a PQ result for us of their benefit in the here and now. Three situations may illustrate this:

• morning at Zeitunsgkiosk. The tabloid asks in large letters, whether it could it be true that now an RAF terrorist come free.
• afternoon walking. A woman in a fur coat to keep a dog not to be hearing argument with a young man who rebelled in "holy anger" about the fact that they have taken on the death of innocent animals in their jewelry purchase.
• evening on the road. A child asks his mother in the face of some inline skaters who roll on the road next to each other, because if that was allowed or if the contrary were not on the footpath.

Ordinary situations very different situations. What benefit is in them have a PQ? We believe PQ helps in these situations more or less openly made to answer questions.

Whether these questions are of general interest and shall have an answer for far-reaching consequences for society, or whether these issues flare up just short and of very personal interest is irrelevant. There are always issues that concern us. They speak to us in the way we ask for - to pause, to an opinion - as always short. They are like little crossroads where we must decide on a direction.

This decision shall be for the most part not on our way in the physical world, but they have influence on our spiritual path. Any answer we give us is a building block to our personality and therefore a paving stone on our (spiritual) life. Yes we

answers to the question of the release of a terrorist, yes to the question of the killing of animals for fur coats, yes to the question of the in-line skating on the street, then we move mentally in a different direction than we were three times with no answer.

answers to these questions and millions more are simply not in us. They are not simply "on the street" or are in books. We must instead find themselves over and over again. We have to decide for them. Even if we react to a new situation with an old answer, we answer the So apparently are just not needed, because she was already in us, so we still have to decide for this old answer. The confirmation or reuse of a response is an action and not a state.

We now think that PQ will help us deal with these ever-necessary decisions. Therefore, for us at the beginning of the PQ just this awareness of the inevitability of permanent decision. We all are constantly in demand. The world calls us every minute, "take a stand! Confess you!"

-Ralf

Lose Inches With Cermic Wrap

opportunities to take a stand ...

The Smart is not on the philosophy that it seems to imply an infinite number of thoughts, but that they also reflects about what she sees what she perceives and observes. Admittedly, it remains mostly in the range of intellectual discussion, but that was not always so. not exist, he has so long been questions until he had reached "the base" and if this reason was the realization that it is simply this -

Socrates has maintained the core of philosophical activity in the market place or in dialogue with his students , then it has a very concrete benefit. It means the shift in perspective with which we view things. The trenchant asking questions often leads to more than the juxtaposition of apparent compromise solutions or quick fixes like that already in the approach to be fragmented are seen.

We have in dealing with our own perception of a great instrument to get on the way to deal with all the sensual, emotional and mental impulses that flow every day for us. But we must be aware that we need to set this tool on reception - otherwise it is useless. I mean the thinking, the conscious reflection of "what is" and this "is" keeps moving.

It is not a static thinking that gets caught in arguments and rational theory, but a thought, as a tool - a tool - offering to the often unintelligible chaos (both outwardly and inwardly) a to provide orientation. This orientation means a ground-breaking support and just not finding the final declarations. The thinking should not stand in that which it thinks - otherwise it defies even the basis, is arrogant and empty. A phenomenon that happens to us in the sciences these days often ...

Thought, which is characterized as a philosophical fact, does not want to turn away from those things by getting them leveled to the generally accepted theories, but would like to know in their organic with and for each other - perhaps understand. But that means the same time that it is courageous enough to take its own position: ask who wants to make, must know whom he intended - who seeks contact with others, need to know where the other begins and he ends - who says the dialogue seriously, must have to say something themselves.

would in this sense explain today I like Al Gore into a hero of the philosophical intelligence, has implemented a few weeks, the warnings from the UN on climate change in a large-scale project: "Live Earth" - a concert in July in major cities this make the world aware of the need for action is - certainly, this is the ozone hole is shrinking. There is no solution, but it is a very clear way of doing things, as they are, to question and to believe in the possibility of change.

-Ina

Models And Genital Tattoos

Why are there PQ? Welcome

IQ, EQ, SQ, MQ ... have not we already have enough quotient? We are to "generally" be smart, can solve problems that is of the verbal, mathematics, or orientation (IQ). It is important to "intelligent" to deal with interpersonal situations (EQ). We should not neglect our spiritual side and deal intelligently with the question of meaning of life (SQ). And of course, sovereignty with respect to moral issues or questions of right and fairness is required.

Galt 30 years ago, a high IQ and nobility of a person, then it does today - As in radio - the mix. Not an intelligence is important, multiple intelligences can be seen in every human being and promote. At least eight have been identified today. So not really have anything to say about Q?

We think not. We believe that all of these intelligences is a little too short, which was formerly very popular: the reflective thinking or the thinking.

to continue series of numbers, identify inappropriate words in a list to be able to empathize, to practice fair dealings and also about the hard material world to look beyond skills are desirable. Without question. But was this all? To which Intelligence could be expected as the ability to think about these intelligences? To which include intelligence, the critical questions we have for the IQ-hype now brought EQ etc.? What intelligence helps the changes in the last 30 years in the perspective to deal in intelligence?

We feel that this neither IQ nor EQ are sufficient even sq. Rather, it seems useful, an intelligence - or, more generally, an attitude and skills - to cultivate, which builds bridges between the intelligences. People need a counter weight for too much too much IQ or EQ. And we see this counterweight from its ability to rise to consciousness. Therefore, PQ describes for us at first an attitude. PQ starts out more in being, as in having. It is our foundation and framework for the play of the other intelligences.

PQ instead of PH, we have then chosen as an acronym to express simply the proximity to the other intelligences. And - we do not conceal it - and marketing considerations have played a part. Because a good idea - and we keep PQ ;-) - is nothing as long as they can not be reduced to a succinct point that stuck in people's minds. PQ on the basis of IQ, EQ, etc. seemed as an attractive label for the Meme "philosophical attitude".

-Ralf

Lungs Cancer Chracter

Welcome to the blog by Ina Schmidt and Ralf Westphal on PQ.

PQ represents Philosophy intelligence or philosophical attitude, although present in these terms but a "P" but no "Q". With the acronym PQ we would rather move to the vicinity of other "types of intelligence." IQ (the "intellectual" intelligence quotient - is not is pleonastic), EQ (Emotional Intelligence Quotient) SQ (spiritual intelligence quotient or sense-oriented) and MQ (Moral intelligence quotient) are already on everyone's lips.

We now think that despite all the relevance of this ratio, these different "intelligences" the world well still benefit more from a can. The recent * Q already cover a nice spectrum of human weaving - but finds something very decisive with them little consideration. The reason, thought, reflection as they were developed in a long philosophical tradition, have seemingly no place in the general Q-hype of recent years.

this blind spot, we want to fill our thoughts on PQ. This blog is our rough draft, in which we express our thoughts first and foremost, reflect and comment. What do we do it later ... We shall see.

If you want to follow the development of PQ is welcome. Commentaries are always welcome.

-Ina and Ralf