Metagedacht today? The great constant A book about PQ moves slowly, slowly closer. A collection of material is started. A central theme will be laid. I find this course to the basic question to which thinking is it because actually in PQ.
it comes to "normal" thinking? Hm .. What does that mean? When we think? If we do not keep? Is thus a book that will motivate thinking not superfluous? Wikipedia defined very broadly so "In thinking all the operations are merged, the interior of an active engagement with ideas , memories and . terms a knowledge to form search " There is basically no escape, everyone thinks constantly, constantly
And that's a good thing, however, suggests PQ... It comes down to how (!) you might think. that this is possible in different ways, press yes, "think" is already a common linguistic nuances like, "think" to "rethink", "think ahead" "think" or off. But I think the can something be highlighted. Just an attitude and even some techniques as well as principles. Because "reflection" is not equal to "reflect".
that extent it is in PQ is not about problem-solving or puzzle-solving in particular. Heuristics or creativity techniques are not the subject of PQ.
But what then? I can think of as the term "distance" field. PQ is about a distance while thinking. PQ is of the view that thinking yielding even better results if you think about it. "Thinking about thinking's", that's PQ. In this respect, I could probably describe as PQ "Metadenken. Yes, it is probably: PQ will motivate them to metadenken. In everyday
think about you after this incident or that problem. You are preoccupied with a theme. Thinking straightens up, turns around this topic. They think for you - so you will appreciate their boss. You think ahead - so appreciate your sports team-mate them. You think about important decisions before the announcement again - that you are valued as responsible.
And when you metadenken? When you think about thinking ahead how your thinking, to reconsider expires? What habits have you on board? What techniques do you use to get closer to subjects? How to find alternatives for decisions and choose between you?
deals with these conditions thematic thought to PQ. And that is why a book seems pointless to PQ. Even if there is much literature for different varieties of thought are (eg problem solving or analytical), then Metadenken rather an issue in the bookshelves. If it is though! Then once metagedacht saves the trouble probably thinking topics.
Matze the leader ... 
The next fanatic (Steffen) 
Tobi 
