by staff reductions in judicial and police
Who is responsible for ensuring that the state has too few resources to effectively combat child porn? Non-Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU), as claimed large parts of the Internet community and the followers of the "Pirate Party" but above all, the FDP. haunts
Through the Internet for months, a campaign against the Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen, called "Zensursula" . The campagneros get upset about the technical implementation of the Secretary-operated locks to power Web sites that spread child pornography images. Your constantly repeated accusation is: the "censorship" in the network of government serves as an excuse to not have to really take action against child abusers and child pornographers. As "proof" for this thesis several media reported on 3.9.2009, chief prosecutor Peter Vogt from Saxony-Anhalt, the determined successfully against child pornography rings have from Despair over the lack of personnel in the police submitted his resignation. (Source: mirror , heise.de )
forget the critics here that their hero Vogt Power locks that they fight vigorously advocated, and that their hate figure of the Leyen as family minister with the staff reductions in police and Justice has little to do next to nothing. But who has to do with it? It is above all the business associations and their favorite party, the FDP who constantly demand for many years, the reduction of personnel in public service and operate. Behind their efforts to put massive tax cuts, especially for entrepreneurs and Wealthy . Who wants to reduce government revenue, without increasing the national debt, must reduce government expenditure, and that means above all, reduce the public sector, thus reduce points. Order at this point "credible" to stay, the FDP has been writing for 2005, each year a "Liberal bleu" in which it summarizes all of their cuts and downsizing plans.
The "Liberal bleu" 2oo9 on Justice
In its "liberals Savings 2009" calls for the FDP parliamentary group including cuts in personnel means the Federal Office of Justice by approx. € 1.3 million (= 8%), the equipment, by approx. € 800,000 (= 20%) and the IT resources to more than 1.3 million €. (Source: FDP ; PDF justice )
The Federal Office of Justice is responsible, among other things for international legal assistance in criminal matters, for instance, for extradition requests against alleged child molesters and child porn distributors abroad. (Source: Federal Office )
addition, this office assists in international custody disputes. (Source: Federal Office )
it comes to such as when their fathers after a divorce with the mother remaining children to Kidnap abroad. As was often the violence of these fathers of the reason for the divorce, the children concerned must be helped as quickly as possible, before something worse happens to them. Operated by the FDP cuts jeopardize that goal and would expose the children involved a great risk.
way does the Federal Office of Justice since 2007, fast and efficient help for the victims of fascist and racist violence. These achievements of the state threatens the FDP with their reduction program.
These relationships were of the FDP, as if their "savings account" written may not be aware of. What she Federal Office of Justice likely to be most disturbing is that this is a central register of business (for example, all the court judgments against employers listed) and pursues business publicity subject to fines, which do not publish their accounts on time. (Source: Federal Office )
In this case, it would be aware of the FDP objective of protecting potential counterfeiters and balance Konkursverschlepper from state prosecution. It may also be that the lawyers party FDP is quite right when there is no government agency cares more about international custody disputes. Because then the whole of this field is only private lawyers and detectives left. That poorer mothers of abducted children who can not afford a lawyer and not a detective, then completely helpless remain shining, the FDP to be accepted.
also calls for the FDP for a reduction in staff resources of the Attorney General 1.2 million € (= 10%), the material resources to almost 800,000 € (= 21%). The Attorney General is in charge of the investigation of terrorist perpetrators of violence that threaten the internal security of Germany, and for the prosecution of perpetrators of genocide and war criminals. (Source: GBA1 , GBA2 )
may have taken since 2006 in office Chief Federal Prosecutor Monika Harms, the hatred of Accountants party FDP, especially so on, because she was a judge at the Federal mainly responsible for the punishment of criminal tax consultants and accountants before. (Source: GBA)
As the FDP is at the federal level in the opposition, they could not enforce most of their savings claims so far. But the mood for the permanent reduction of government services that make it along with many fellow journalists, also affects the other parties, especially those that form a coalition with the FDP or coalition do: CDU, CSU and SPD.
staff reductions in NRW
sits at country level, the FDP in many governments, such as in North Rhine-Westphalia . There, the CDU-FDP cabinet decided in August 2009, in 2010, emphasized in the civil and criminal courts and the prosecutors in the country a total of 229 posts, of which only 34 judges and prosecutors offices. The legal expert of the SPD Sichau Frank said in a commentary on the cabinet decision and the draft state budget. (Source: SPD NRW )
The criminal investigation is in NRW, it may be even worse. In September 2009, reported the German Police Union at its annual meeting in mountain. Gladbach , the CID of the Oberbergische circle have exactly one official is available, which should take care of all cases of computer crime. From January to August, he had received 800 new cases on the desk. The average age lies in almost all areas of criminal investigation department on 50 and sick leave due to massive overload partly at 25%. Interior Minister is responsible Ingo Wolf (FDP), which snubbed the conference with a speech dripping with arrogance and ignorance. How it looks if the state apparatus falls into the hands of the public enemy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment