Carefree Pads And Rash

PQ PQ is like driving

was the thought of stepping back, I very impressive, Ralf and I think the discovery of one's own standards is building almost a little bit out on - Only from the perspective that arises when I three steps behind the familiar and taken for granted back to do, is the one from which I may know something about me. Salman Rushdie has once said but so beautiful that you just only the whole can see the picture, if you fall out of line - and that's just so exciting: in the truest sense of the word you fall out of line, if one adopts this perspective. That attitude - that describes what it's PQ is also - is something special, they are not often found, and if so, is there are very strange reactions to it: from "the thing is not done" to "brilliant" is all there and from these reactions can usually say more about their representatives, as to the content, leading to these reactions. Why is a philosophical attitude that unusual or is it only unusual in the sense of uncomfortable? I am convinced - just like you Ralf - that in the implementation of PQ experienced the joy goes, a joy that kindled the fact that life is what it is and in this life completely different things on the occasion of their joy for what we are looking for "fun" (often, unfortunately, the little brother of the hollow my pleasure) to have to put in our lives. What constitutes the acceptance of the world or life is not the passive stepping back into the inner life, but the confidence and respect for what I find in this life. I am able, with all the work, to make it possible to develop myself and to change off the ground, but that has always something to do with the fact that the world continues to donate the materials for it and it deserves recognition. Real joy has always something to do with "touch", and when we mentioned in the receding not only pause, but we remove from the world, then we lose the opportunity to experience this joy. It's about a movement that oscillates between the inner and outer, and both the ratio is steadily. This ability has given us, in essence, my children, they often dominate naturally, but in light of what we in the course of time together in our lives to tasks they have a resistant "to be practiced - by a bit like driving a car the forest, even if it sometimes looks as if we would do no more than the control in both hands to hold, we must make it very carefully to ensure that the car remains at the pace on the road, where we want it ...

Ina

Airlock In Underfloor Pipe

question standards to judge

The desire for freedom and self-determination has its price: It costs the effort, the difference in the world who oppose us to constantly evaluate, and share that to us in terms. We must give them a meaning, because they naturally do not own.

What does it mean for me if it rains? Is it a burden, because I must keep an umbrella, although I'm already festooned with shopping bags? Or is it a pleasure, because I loved my romantic under one umbrella Sitting look at the Alster?

What do the sounds of children from the apartment next door to me? They disturb my well-earned rest after a busy day? Or they are soothing to me evidence that it is about Germany's future but not yet ordered that bad?

rain drought, noise: silence - these are just differences in humidity and air movement environment. Nothing more. Only through the perception of a certain moisture level or sound pressure, first by us as observers, they have a value in which we be-worth-en. The most

happens automatically and unconsciously ... but that may just happen consciously. And it should and must always then pass consciously, if we want to be free and open. For if we evaluate unconsciously and automatically place consciously and deliberately, then comes up is whether we ourselves are to assess because, that is, whether we look at the rating scale have been - or whether we have adopted a foreign rating scale, and so far only "cud" pre-judgments.

If we begin to explore the world as children and young people, we certainly do well to take on assessment standards of our environment first. We can make it from the condensed experience of our fellow human beings and ancestors. You can spare us some unpleasant experience. Automating assessments and adhere to the back free for more important things.

unconsciousness and automatisms are so obviously important in life. Even if we are condemned to judgments for us to decide, but can the "damn judgments" cease once, right? A world in which we always want to judge everything and just be aware in order not to leave any gap, beginning to slip through the lack of freedom might be, even unbearable. Neither for us nor for others. And they would not be feasible, because all decisions would run due to the pressure to consciousness much more slowly.

do For all the love for awareness and PQ we say on the other side well to Rate conscious not to overdo it. Here as elsewhere in life, it depends on the right measure.

However: the automation of assessments we should be already aware of. Not necessarily at the time of evaluation, for as the unconsciousness is so both in terms of the assessment as well as the observation of the evaluation, so to speak, the meta-evaluation, intended.

In times of peace we do then, however, well to reflect on our automatic ratings. Then we should think about it after.

If we go through a pedestrian area and hold out to us begging hands, we generally choose Automatically, something into it down or not. And that's totally ok. For while their shopping trip to evaluate every beggar must always remember this, the goal is not to be a philosophical attitude. Then it would really quick assessment of the freedom to be a blast judging the load, we would want to avoid.

While we will however take a break while shopping or at home or perhaps not until later in the holiday ... because we should be able to reflect on our subconscious decision. The seller of a homeless newspaper or donate clothes in the post box like us to the beggar-lined shopping and our unconscious judgments . Remember And then (!) We should be willing and able to consciously consider our standards of value behind our decisions to reconsider, revise, if necessary, and finally to accept as our own.

PQ can be so far may be regarded as intellectual rumination: If a deer is startled when grazing, then it sets the pleasurable chewing and escaping automatically. Only when it has found peace, it begins with the chewing of what it had taken before the flight itself. During the flight there was no time for it.

is similar to the awareness of our assessments. You need some rest to their subject from all sides to consider and finally, after considering the influence of the observed scales assign a value. In the hustle and bustle of everyday life but do not always have time, so many judgments first (!) Must be made automatically.

Maybe I should clarify why PQ so: Only conscious choices can be free and serve to self-determination. These conscious decisions must not be made necessary in the moment of observation - the rain falls, children's noises on the next room - can be prepared in advance but rest in more fundamental ways. More important than the conscious decision regarding an observation is therefore the conscious Choosing a scale that can then be applied at the time of observation quite automatically.

How far then measure and monitor decision decision apart, this can be very different. Maybe days, weeks, years, perhaps only seconds or minutes.

is important is the fundamental openness to reconsider standards even aware of and adapt. Think about this then most of all be an after-thought, because it is always first a scale from one (automatic) decision there. The sooner we may have been aware - or he is from deeper, unconscious automatisms created or we have taken him unconscious. When it comes

PQ so more of a thinking pre-and post-thinking than just about thinking. A Philsophische position distances itself from the ever-changing moment and looks at life in the overview that ranges from yesterday to tomorrow, as a whole.

Metal Sonic Screwdriver 10th Doctor

Damn

We're all day and always in a barrage, a barrage of differences. Because only differences we can perceive. It starts at the physical level using electromagnetic vibrations or sound waves, without the difference between high and low amplitude oscillations not. This continues on a biological level, in the exercise that works only on nerves their messages are frequency modulated, ie, differences in distance between their amplitudes. And that leads to the infinite variety of building upon impressions and thoughts, each of which are never without its opposite.

Whether the differences here rather exist in a continuum as the sound pressure, or whether they are diskrekt such as pregnancy (pregnancy is a bit does not really exist), which is not so important here. It is essential that the world consists solely of differences that, yes, we have to evaluate.

how free we feel (also a difference: free: not free!), This finding is also not immediately important. The differences There are, indeed, they almost make out the existence, if we look at it or not. More or less restrictions do not alter the amount of the differences with which we are confronted continuously.

more or less restrictions, support, frame, however, have influence on the way we deal with the differences. Rules, beliefs, corsets are in fact invariably means of evaluating differences. Whether a particular noise is loud or soft, it is clear not only by the presence or absence of ear pain, but also eg by the laws. Pregnant or not is not a question of faith, but which side of that difference to be considered as good or bad is entirely.

true: false and good: bad are the classic drawers into which we classify differences and constant rule-based. These drawers are man-made, because they point to a state value, which he naturally can not have. Nature knows no values, but only states as results of changes along causal chains. In nature and without a judgmental observer everything is just the way it is.

That is not natural that even animals do not sit down differences with respect and they judge to be desirable or to avoid, and therefore as good or bad. This assessment is not at all or not as much aware as humans.

However, once awareness when assessing in play, it changes qualitatively. Suddenly, the result is in fact not inevitable and quasi berechnenbar. Conscious assessed by definiton is rather a results open judging. At least, actually. Because the reservation again and again and does it make any difference even from just the awareness. as everyone can attest who has ever tried to deliberately tried to prevent a fall - so to speak, consciousness is the opposite of automatic.

The interesting judgments about differences are the ones that are made at the level of consciousness, or at least could be like. All others are indeed at least outside the control of spontaneous and run automatically.

are certainly aware of the judgments to be felled only a tiny portion of the total amount of all judgments in every moment. Nevertheless, or perhaps because they make us grief. For with conscious decisions we're asked, not an automated instance in us. And if we are asked, that our consciousness, then the output of the assessment is first and foremost principle open. We can always consciously decide one way or another or completely different. At least we think so, if we postulate a fundamental freedom of the will, and which I will here assume once.

the openness of our conscious decisions, we are now but certainly not (always) right. On the one does the balance of the assessed options time and effort. Especially in an ever faster moving world seems counterproductive. On the other hand, a sentence, a choice later turn out to be suboptimal with respect to the intended purpose. We opt for a washing machine - and the next day to read a leaflet advertising a special offer with 20% discount for the same model. Or we can choose for crossing a red traffic light - and a police officer overlooked the street, which places us at once to the speech.

conscious decisions involve so per se and to the threat of "how to's, it's done wrong."

Therefore, it seems to me there has been a co-evolution of consciousness and awareness corsets. Or put differently: consciousness could not emerge just like that, but had to slow to shell out for biological automation. But then it has stripped the country, but worn in the form of mental corset with it. On the possibility of false judgments, it needs to consciousness as it were used to.

That does not matter. Rather, it is quite natural. But these corsets are still opposed to the intended purpose of awareness enjoyment of freedom through self-determination. Because self-determination requires even conscience as the core.

ie: if you want to be free to determine who is would that do must also be awareness and thus also their own, quasi-manual judgments. is a joyful life of self determination, it is not without conscious evaluation of us laying under a barrage differences. And so I'm

back to PQ: A Philosophical attitude will help with the barrage to be done, without slipping into (outdated) corset. In PQ are therefore devoted to the judgments, ie decisions and values, ie standards. And so it goes also to (self-) responsibility and the constant possibility of miscarriages of justice, ie failure.

Bug Bite Scar Removal Laser

Under fire

Apart from Going to school, work, and administrative procedures, one might say, it is somehow mostly to the "good life", right? Are not we living in a leisure society, and is not leisure-time = pleasure? Does not rotate so far everything about joy-time, thus maximizing pleasure?

Yes, somehow has to do Arts course with joy. But to limit the opportunities for joy in their free time, I'd pity. Why should not I at school with joy to be there to do work on bread with joy, or a troubled officials meet with joy?

is always and everywhere the opportunity to celebrate - if we are open because of it. By robustness, we defend the hard-conquered islands of joy at home and Arts. Without openness, we forgive us but the chance to discover more of these islands. Joy is indeed up to her, by definition, contradictory situations such as those of loss and justified fear always possible. However, we feel that probably not.

I think the feeling most people get most of the time "under fire". The sparkling life force in them, their "will to pleasure" has to constantly take cover from hostile action. Imperceptibly from the mundane to reach to significant and obvious or severe.

may be imperceptibly small the annoyance of someone who has given us the door is not stopped. But also an uncertainty as to the employment relationship may look like next year, need not be obvious, but can remain latent and almost imperceptibly press the joy in everyday life.

Banal is when a warning reminding us for weeks to a low account balance. Obviously, the "bombardment" of our joy when we are compelled by a tailgaters on the highway.

And when we experience severe cuts in our lives like fire or accident, which put our planning, our sense of security to the test.

A good life does not happen just like that also. It results not only from almost entirely natural, but we have basically always do something about it. Apparently is not joy possible without that we defend ourselves against everything, or at least work hard for it. But that is not

naturally? Sort of. Life's just a vale of tears - right? So it looks like at least if you look at the faces of the commuters on buses and trains in a big city like Hamburg. There is no joy to read.

me it seems initially quite plausible that exists between robustness and openness of a permanent imbalance. To withstand the hostility of everyday life can be much in demand robustness and openness seems to be little pay off. It looks as if the Wall is the joy only thicker, stronger and more united.

But was that ever different? Was also the former perhaps better? Yes and no.

Yes, I think, earlier it was different because the world was less complex earlier. Where only two washing machines with only one dealer in range to choose from, there is no fear on from making the wrong choice, because you have researched the options and inadequate price options. A world where the ogre distant mythical beings, of which only few Slowcoach report produced only homely horror in the face of such further atrocities, but a world in which suicide bombers or other political violence perpetrators potentially anyone with extinction or mutilation threaten, who thinks only of a long-distance - and the millions each year - which affects the feeling of joy of course.

On the other hand, no sooner it was of course no different. The world was less complex, but is also offered in the smaller, more mundane domestic world plenty of chances, "bombardment" of joy to feel. Today it is a great suffering for many women to have a child - in the past it was a great sorrow to avoid a child can not. Today generates threat of unemployment or real insecurity and existential fears - in the past was often synonymous with unemployment Nahrungslosigkeit and therefore death.

was past and today and is the joy that is "under fire". Whether this attack is stronger today ... This is an open question. My feeling is that many people feel it more today. The reason: their desire for freedom and self determination.

Yes, I think, as simple as that

Who wants to live in freedom and self-determined - and the biggest majority in the Western world, I would take time - which is tantamount can not help yourself to the balancing of robustness and to take care of openness. And those who take care of themselves to something, of course, noticed what prevents him from what he makes this effort all the easier. Who

A must finish what you start. Thus, with the freedom and self determination. Who wants to enjoy it - who says so, whether to enjoy at all - who frees herself from all disabilities and ultimately, of all the supports. See

is in every child: In the beginning a child lives with joy in a sheltered world. His freedom and self-determination operate in a very narrow framework. But then the child develops more of its own. It aims beyond the frame. For example, it wants to buy more toys or clothes as his parents. So extend the framework and the parents give the child some pocket money to have it decide certain. This process then continues to own Monetary salary, the maximum self-determination (within budget) permits - but does not offer more support. In the end, everyone in the child's age and grown out of pocket money people solely responsible for his bank balance. Parents can do and should not serve as supports to Sankt indefinitely.

And so it is ultimately in all areas of life. Who wants to be less constrained to decide who would like yourself who seeks freedom from restrictions and on everything ... who must live with the consequences of self-determination and self-responsibility.

freedom means the absence of props, frames, targets. Or more precisely, simply accepted the waiver of Frame on unquestioned rules, unreflective traditions, thoughtless faith. And so I'm

back to PQ. For PQ helps to fill the gap caused by the release of rules, frames, traditions, beliefs. I mean, who wants to be truly free and thus to self-determination "convicted" of doing good is it to develop a philosophical attitude. Because it offers a way of questioning the joy to come in balancing.