Friday, May 4, 2007

Pokemon Crystal Cydia Source

Why transparency?

Ina has raised some questions that a philosophical attitude, or rather, those who want to take them or think they have already taken, should be of interest. To face these questions every now and then, raises awareness of themselves and their own position in the immediate or wider (social) context. Because with all due respect, it's about philosophy, and therefore also in PQ.

What makes me, as the context of my "parts" are, of what I am and do? As I stand in relation to the world around me? What is the world, how are their "parts" together? Finally, how does my action or the action of another of these relationships, how verschöbe its composition? These are central questions of philosophy. She is the mother of the conscious distinction, and thus also the relationship of the difference.

But why now the question of accountability for my decisions and actions other ? Why the question about the transparency of my motives, the basis for accountability?

For me these questions with awareness, building upon the sense of responsibility and out again to do constructive trust.

If I myself do not have my motives in mind, am I can not account on the way to a decision and my priorities and values, then there is a good deal of my personality, "under the surface." It is even I can not 'predictable and reliable. Then I can always surprise only back itself - whether it is always positive surprises but I doubt it. Surprise is just a short distance from unpredictability. And that is bad for everyone (social) context. No one likes to live in an unpredictable nature, we are constantly trying to tame nature and foreseeability of her drive out the unwelcome surprises. Nor may it be with unpredictable people together. (The fact that in the end despite all the effort but then not everything is predictable or can be made and how it helps living in the PQ should be subject of another article.)

why It is important not only that I myself can understand my choices, but also give another insight, that make me transparent and this transparency before even aspiring to me. The first is to track down the reasons - what does that mean at this point, they change in their weight. It is just about her collection. More does not want transparency. I know what moves me the forces that act in me?

In the second step is then a matter of determining the relationships between these forces. Strung together they form an inner causal chain, so to speak. Only when that is threaded, then I can say that I am aware of a decision. Only I can stand her and take responsibility.

trust in others can now take me all the more, the clearer I decide for you / handle. Get to know me is not just to see the results of my decisions / actions simply, but also the way there. Where can I give such an insight into me, as occurs nearby. And where near arises because trust can flourish.

Who understands why something is happening, what is the causal chain behind it, where it is easier, of what is to close on the future. Openness, transparency, accountability now reduces complexity tomorrow. Because trust is a means of Reduction of complexity. Where can I trust, I must observe that is just not always all the details and check. Familiar as I can "black box" look, that hide its complex inner workings.

So PQ leads indirectly to the promotion of trust to a reduction of complexity, although it first may appear different. If I made a philosophical stance, me and my motives of the links will deliberately to take responsibility. When are for me and other decision-making and chains of action on that basis to understand. Then I can rely on me, then others can rely on me. And then ... then the banners, the Verifiable it were packaged in a box and at first are discarded. Then no further testing or continuous vigilance is necessary. This saves power.

PQ does not mean intellectual hypertrophy in the form of deliberate non-stop questioning. PQ is rather to be able to give account to make transparent, establish accountability for each retrievable ability to realize when needed. But this ability does not need to constantly applied to everything. On the contrary, your aim is to remain possible in the background. Even thought or consciousness is not a goal in itself but a step on the path to a destination. Is this achieved - such as trust in me and others - may I direct my steps again somewhere else.

Thursday, May 3, 2007

Cancun National Airport

questions to PQ

To be clear about their own behavior to get themselves to a philosophical attitude "check" out, it is necessary not only things but also himself to be questioned and.

- How to understand my actions / my decision to others?
- How do I clear out my motives?
- my behavior based on which, what or where, what should be?
- How do I deal with temporary and opacity to around me?
- What are the consequences I expect and how I will handle it?
- What goals, what expectations I have of my actions?

The list must be completed individually, of course ...

Ina

Friday, March 23, 2007

Properly Put Adult Diaper

sense needs a counterpart

Ina has written "meaningfulness arises whenever we feel that we meet ourselves, where we are" - that sounds good. Self-correlation, Kongurenz, authenticity certainly are in principle desirable.

However I am missing in the description of purpose, that is the sense of meaning in life, something. And that's that or the other, a general age where we are ego.

Fullness of meaning we can not create on our own all alone. As the ego, we feel fullness of meaning only where we are for an old. Meaning in life comes only in giving and giving need a receiver. Without surrender, without aim and purpose of the gift does not make sense. The more immediate result

then for our ego sense fullness, more personal relationship with the old. The direct feedback is given to us that our gift will be gratefully accepted, the clearer we feel appreciated us, the more sense we feel.

is surprising here now, how different gifts and recipients can and still produce in us a sense of meaningfulness. Receiver can be individual people or animals, but groups or masses. Recipient must also face not personally, and may be anonymous and far, or perhaps are still in the future.

And our gifts need not be material. Objects, actions, words, ideas, or even mere (Da) Can be considered as a gift.

Wasimmer we choose the good for an old, wieimmer we turn deliberately to a person in the hope that our gift will be accepted favorably, as a gift for him would be recognized by us is meaningful.

However, we feel the sense only if we wieimmer some sort of feedback from the receiver to get to get us through and in our administration also sees.

Whether this feedback in the form of a smile or a rain shower after a long drought comes, whether what we perceive as feedback is really us or we can just imagine ... all this does not matter. We need only give the impression of causality have to feel and sense.

needs meaning, therefore, correlation between us and others, someone or something. Fullness of meaning is thus not a condition, but rather the color of a process. And this process must take place probably more aware of ever changing our opponent.

Or vice versa: as processes always make trouble, it is probably so that the desire for a continued meaningful state is greater, the changing is our opponent. Then, the search for recipients of our gifts, which are reasonably constant.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Prices Of La Boxing Membership?

pause and prudence

In Ralf's thoughts about the "pause" and the question of how can we hope to keep in the largest daily stress, to make us not lose, I always went back to the concept of prudence, the "reflection "through the head, which may perhaps be something like the small and daily goal of a philosophical attitude. PQ brings us to his senses - and thus creates a real and serious health can be integrated in dealing with what is happening around us. This may seem like a win sound pious wish, but if we rid ourselves of the notion that the only reason to do a survey to gain control (as in our car driving example), it falls short. We create an overview of the context in which we move, not over the entire course of the world and the things - if we can extend our context, this is wonderful, but when we do not create an "ultimate knowledge", we can not fail it, or despair. The repose and reflection has to do with a very specific goal - no one but ourselves can determine when we come to their senses and leave when we want to return to the next to stop the speed loop and ask for the "meaning". This sense is therefore not to be determined content - ie: meaningful life must be from "a good job, family, a pet and at least one volunteer activity" are composed, but common sense always occurs when we feel that we meet ourselves , where we are. Then we have no claims to the outside, but hopefully interest, a curiosity and desire for dialogue -. But this is something different and has nothing to do with the control: it can be to things.
use if we ever pause and come to their senses and then to take the next step, we move this for personal development, with its value in itself and thus become an internal compass - and this benefit to only the considered treatment of the relationship that we as imperfect, isolated individuals to our world - not otherwise PQ.